Effects of different menthol administration routes on endurance performance and physiological responses in the heat: a network meta-analysis.
- 2026-05-18
- Frontiers in nutrition 13
- Yongliang Zhu
- Junyu Zhao
- Jiayi Yao
- Haozhe Wang
- Xiaotong Yuan
- PubMed: 42232581
- DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1833420
Study Design
- Type
- Systematic Review
- Methods
- systematically evaluate and compare the relative efficacy of three menthol administration routes-ingestion (ING), mouth rinsing (MR), and topical application (Top)-on exercise performance and physiological responses in the heat; network meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials
Objective
This study employed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to systematically evaluate and compare the relative efficacy of three menthol administration routes-ingestion (ING), mouth rinsing (MR), and topical application (Top)-on exercise performance and physiological responses in the heat, aiming to explore potential task-oriented personalized supplementation strategies.Methods
Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating menthol interventions on exercise performance in hot environments (T≥25 °C), with a search deadline of March 2, 2026. Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 software.Results
The network meta-analysis of the 15 included randomized controlled trials revealed outcome-specific trends in exercise performance, although most pairwise comparisons did not reach statistical significance. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ingestion (ING) demonstrated a potential trend for improving endurance performance (SUCRA = 76.1%), while mouth rinsing (MR) showed a tendency for enhancing mean power output (SUCRA = 66.9%). Regarding physiological responses, the impact of all administration routes on core temperature (Tc) and heart rate (HR) was modest and lacked statistically significant differences compared to control conditions. Specifically, ING ranked relatively higher in maintaining core temperature (SUCRA = 67.0%), whereas topical application (Top) exhibited the weakest potential for thermoregulation (SUCRA = 6.2%) and might even lead to a slight upward trend in temperature due to the physical obstruction of heat dissipation.Conclusion
The interventional efficacy of menthol in the heat appears to be co-regulated by the administration route and the specific exercise task. While the current evidence does not establish definitive superiority among the administration routes due to the lack of statistical significance, ingestion may serve as an exploratory option for long-duration endurance events, whereas mouth rinsing could be considered for tasks focusing on instantaneous power output. Given that menthol may mask actual subjective thermal perception without alleviating objective physiological heat strain, its application must be combined with objective physiological monitoring in practice to ensure exercise safety.Systematic review registration
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD420261340546.Research Insights
Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ingestion (ING) demonstrated a potential trend for improving endurance performance (SUCRA = 76.1%)
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
mouth rinsing (MR) showed a tendency for enhancing mean power output (SUCRA = 66.9%)
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
the impact of all administration routes on core temperature (Tc) and heart rate (HR) was modest and lacked statistically significant differences compared to control conditions
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
the impact of all administration routes on core temperature (Tc) and heart rate (HR) was modest and lacked statistically significant differences compared to control conditions
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Adverse Events Reported
Given that menthol may mask actual subjective thermal perception without alleviating objective physiological heat strain, its application must be combined with objective physiological monitoring in practice to ensure exercise safety.
- Finding
- Reported