Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Efficacy of cola ingestion for oesophageal food bolus impaction: open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

  • 2023-12-11
  • BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 383
    • E G Tiebie
    • E P Baerends
    • T Boeije
    • P G Frankenmolen
    • H Lameijer
    • W van den Berg
    • K J van Stralen
    • K J van Stralen
    • M L Ridderikhof
    • A J Bredenoord

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Sample size
n = 51
Population
51 adults presenting with complete oesophageal food bolus impaction, defined as a sudden inability to pass saliva after consumption of foods
Methods
Open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial; 28 patients in the intervention group instructed to consume 25 mL cups of cola at intervals up to a maximum total volume of 200 mL; 23 patients in the control group awaited spontaneous passage
Blinding
Open-label
Duration
between 22 December 2019 and 16 June 2022

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of cola in resolving complete oesophageal food bolus impaction.

Design

Open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Setting

Emergency departments of five Dutch hospitals at the secondary and tertiary level, between 22 December 2019 and 16 June 2022.

Participants

51 adults presenting with complete oesophageal food bolus impaction, defined as a sudden inability to pass saliva after consumption of foods. Patients who ingested meat that contained bones, and patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of IV or higher were excluded.

Interventions

28 patients in the intervention group were instructed to consume 25 mL cups of cola at intervals up to a maximum total volume of 200 mL. 23 patients in the control group awaited spontaneous passage. In either group, if complete resolution of symptoms did not occur, endoscopic removal was performed following current guidelines: within 6 hours for patients with complete obstruction, and within 24 hours for partial obstruction. In case of complete resolution of symptoms, elective diagnostic endoscopy was required.

Main outcome measures

Improvement of oesophageal food bolus obstruction as reported by patients (ie, aggregate of complete and partial passage), and evaluation of complete passage. The secondary outcome was any intervention related adverse event.

Results

Cola did not have a meaningful effect on the improvement of food bolus obstruction (17/28 (61%) intervention v 14/23 (61%) control; odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 3.1; relative risk reduction 0.0, 95% confidence interval -0.55 to 0.36; P>0.99). Complete passage was reported more often in the intervention group but this difference was not significant (12/28 (43%) intervention v 8/23 (35%) control; odds ratio 1.4 (0.45 to 4.4); relative risk reduction -0.23 (-1.5 to 0.39); P=0.58). No severe adverse events occurred. However, six (21%) patients in the intervention group experienced temporary discomfort after drinking cola.

Conclusions

In this study, cola consumption did not lead to a higher rate of improvement of complete oesophageal food bolus impaction. Given the lack of adverse events in the treatment group and some events of resolution after treatment, cola might be considered as a first line treatment, but should not delay any planning of endoscopic management.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register (currently International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) NL8312.

Research Insights

  • Cola did not have a meaningful effect on the improvement of food bolus obstruction (17/28 (61%) intervention v 14/23 (61%) control; odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 3.1; relative risk reduction 0.0, 95% confidence interval -0.55 to 0.36; P>0.99).

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 mL cups at intervals up to a maximum total volume of 200 mL
  • Complete passage was reported more often in the intervention group but this difference was not significant (12/28 (43%) intervention v 8/23 (35%) control; odds ratio 1.4 (0.45 to 4.4); relative risk reduction -0.23 (-1.5 to 0.39); P=0.58).

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 mL cups at intervals up to a maximum total volume of 200 mL

Adverse Events Reported

  • ColaOverall tolerability

    No severe adverse events occurred.

    Finding
    Reported
  • Colatemporary discomfort

    However, six (21%) patients in the intervention group experienced temporary discomfort after drinking cola.

    Finding
    Reported
Back to top