Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Population
Forty chronic insomnia participants
Methods
randomized to either real or sham rTMS group; rTMS administered once per day continuously for 14 days over the left DLPFC; left DLPFC GABA level relative to creatine measured by 1H-MRS; insomnia symptom evaluated by Insomnia Severity Index
Blinding
Double-blind
Duration
14 days
Funding
Unclear

Objective

To investigate changes in the level of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of patients with chronic insomnia treated with real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as compared to sham-rTMS, as measured with 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-MRS).

Methods

Forty chronic insomnia participants were randomized to either real or sham rTMS group. The rTMS was administered once per day Continuously for 14 days with the stimulation over the left DLPFC. Left DLPFC GABA level relative to creatine (Cr) was measured by 1H-MRS. Insomnia symptom was evaluated by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). MRS and ISI were assessed among all participants before and after treatment. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100047255).

Results

After treatment, the ISI score in real rTMS group was markedly decreased as compared to pre-rTMS (t = -4.25, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.90), whereas no significant change in ISI was observed in the group of sham rTMS. In addition, we observed a significant increase of GABA+/Cr concentration in the real rTMS group after stimulation (0.37 ± 0.11 to 0.40 ± 0.11, p = 0.039), but that of sham did not (0.38 ± 0.10 to 0.39 ± 0.11, p = 0.151). However, there was no significant association between the change of GABA+/Cr in left DLPFC and the changes of ISI scores in the two groups.

Conclusion

1 Hz rTMS has the potential to increase GABA + level in left DLPFC of patients with chronic insomnia, and warrants further investigation.

Research Insights

    Back to top