Effect of an Immune-Boosting, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Food Supplement in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.
- 2023-04-01
- Nutrients 15(7)
- Sandra Reino-Gelardo
- Marta Palop-Cervera
- Nieves Aparisi-Valero
- Ignacio Espinosa-San Miguel
- Noelia Lozano-Rodríguez
- Gonzalo Llop-Furquet
- Laura Sanchis-Artero
- Ernesto Cortés-Castell
- Mercedes Rizo-Baeza
- Xavier Cortés-Rizo
- PubMed: 37049576
- DOI: 10.3390/nu15071736
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Population
- 162 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19
- Methods
- Prospective randomized non-blinded clinical trial; all patients received standard treatment, intervention group given one food supplement stick daily during admission
- Blinding
- Open-label
- Duration
- during their admission (eight months recruitment)
- Funding
- Unclear
- Rigorous Journal
Background
COVID-19 disease is a serious global health problem. Few treatments have been shown to reduce mortality and accelerate time to recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19.Methods
A prospective randomized non-blinded clinical trial was conducted in a sample of 162 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 recruited over eight months. All patients received standard treatment, but the intervention group (n = 67) was given one food supplement stick daily during their admission. After collecting the study variables, a statistical analysis was performed comparing the intervention and control groups and a multivariate analysis controlling for variables that could act as confounding factors.Results
ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability. Moreover, the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001); patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007).Conclusions
In this trial, the administration of a food supplement (Gasteel Plus®) was shown to be a protective factor in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 and allowed early recovery from digestive symptoms and a shorter hospital stay in patients with a normal-mild-moderate chest X-ray at admission (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04666116).Research Insights
ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily
patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- one food supplement stick daily