Effect of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis DSM29784 on hen performance, egg quality indices, and apparent retention of dietary components in laying hens from 19 to 48 weeks of age.
- 2019-11
- Poultry Science 98(11)
- M. Neijat
- R. Shirley
- J. Barton
- P. Thiery
- A. Welsher
- E. Kiarie
- PubMed: 31222316
- DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez324
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate egg production, quality, and apparent retention (AR) of components in response to a multi-dose application of a single strain Bacillus subtilis (SSB; DSM29784) in a corn-soybean meal basal diet fed to hens (19 to 48 wk of age). The treatments consisted of a basal diet with either no probiotic (control, CON), 1.1E+08 (low, LSSB), 2.2E+08 (medium, MSSB) or 1.1E+09 (high, HSSB) CFU/kg of diet. A total of 336, 19-wk old Shaver White layers were used at a stocking density of 7 and 6 hens/replicate-cage in layer I (week-19 to 28) and layer II (week-29 to 48) phases, respectively. Evaluated variables included feed intake (FI), body weight (BW), feed conversion ratio (FCR), egg production, weight, mass, and egg quality (shell thickness, shell breaking strength, albumen height (AH), and Haugh unit (HU)). Excreta was collected at the end of week-28 for AR of components and apparent metabolizable energy (AME). Supplementation of SSB increased (P = 0.008) FI during peak egg-lay (week-24) and BW increased linearly (P = 0.019) in early layer II (week-32). In layer I, LSSB compared with CON increased EM (g/egg) by 3.3% (P = 0.049). In layer II, SSB inclusion tended to improve FCR (linear, P = 0.094; g FI: g EM). Although shell breaking strength was lowest at week-20 with HSSB (4.518 vs. 4.889 kgf for HSSB vs. CON; P = 0.045), AH and HU were improved at higher dose of SSB, in both phases (P ≤ 0.005). Apparent retention of dry matter, AME, and minerals were improved (P < 0.0001) in a dose response. Hence, while the low dose of B. subtilis DSM29784 improved hen performance and maintained egg quality in both phases, a higher dose of SSB improved the interior protein quality of eggs (AH and HU).
Keywords: B. subtilis; egg quality; hens; nutrient retention; performance.
Research Insights
Supplement | Health Outcome | Effect Type | Effect Size |
---|---|---|---|
Bacillus subtilis HU58 | Improved Average Daily Feed Intake | Beneficial | Moderate |
Bacillus subtilis HU58 | Improved Egg Mass | Beneficial | Small |
Bacillus subtilis HU58 | Improved Feed Conversion Ratio | Beneficial | Small |
Bacillus subtilis HU58 | Improved Nutrient Retention | Beneficial | Large |
Bacillus subtilis HU58 | Increased Body Weight | Beneficial | Moderate |
Bacillus subtilis HU58 | Reduced Shell Breaking Strength | Harmful | Small |
Bacillus subtilis SNZ-1972 | Improved Dietary Component Retention | Beneficial | Large |
Bacillus subtilis SNZ-1972 | Improved Egg Mass During Layer I for Low Dose | Beneficial | Small |
Bacillus subtilis SNZ-1972 | Improved Feed Conversion Ratio | Beneficial | Small |
Bacillus subtilis SNZ-1972 | Increased Body Weight | Beneficial | Moderate |
Bacillus subtilis SNZ-1972 | Increased Feed Intake During Peak Egg-Laying | Beneficial | Moderate |