- 2025-12-12
- Journal of oral & facial pain and headache 39(4)
- Siyu Zou
- Yue Yue
- Xinyu Wang
- Qinglan Liu
Study Design
- Type
- Systematic Review
- Sample size
- n = 38
- Population
- patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and restricted jaw mobility
- Methods
- comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating 13 intra-articular drug injections; network meta-analysis
Background
This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of 13 intra-articular pharmacologic interventions in improving maximal mouth opening (MMO), pain relief, and functional recovery in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and restricted jaw mobility.Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTS) evaluating the effects of 13 intra-articular drug injections in patients with limited mouth opening TMD. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias (ROB) tool, and data were independently extracted by two researchers. Primary outcomes included maximum mouth opening (MMO) and pain intensity; secondary outcomes included joint lateral and protrusive movements.Results
A total of 38 RCTs involving 1533 TMD patients were included. Thirteen different agents (including HA: hyaluronic acid, PRF: platelet-rich fibrin, PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor, PRP: platelet-rich plasma, MOR: morphine, LA: local anesthetic, MA: micro-fragment fat, TRA: tramadol, SAL: Saline, GC: glucocorticoid, GLU: glucose, NS: non-steroidal, and ARTH: arthrocentesis only) were evaluated. NMA results showed that PRF injection after arthrocentesis significantly improved the maximum temporomandibular joint opening (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 99.1%) compared with arthrocentesis alone. MA injection following arthrocentesis was most effective for pain reduction (SUCRA: 84.7%), followed by PRF (SUCRA: 78.2%). PRF also led to significant improvements in lateral jaw movement (SUCRA: 95.5%) and protrusive movement (SUCRA: 63.5%) compared to arthrocentesis alone.Conclusions
Based on the network ranking chart, PRF injection after arthrocentesis offers the greatest benefits for functional recovery in TMD patients. However, additional rigorous literature is required to validate this assertion.Clinical trial registration
Registration number is INPLASY202450107.