Effect of probiotics on glycemic control and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial.
- 2024-09-16
- Frontiers in endocrinology 15
- Xuchao Peng
- Hong Xian
- Ning Ge
- Lisha Hou
- Tianjiao Tang
- Dongmei Xie
- Langli Gao
- Jirong Yue
- PubMed: 39351535
- DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1440286
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 490
- Population
- adults aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Methods
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial; intervention group received 25 ml probiotic beverage (≥10^8 CFU/mL Lactobacillus) four times daily; control group received equal volume of inactivated Lactobacillus
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Duration
- 16 weeks
- Funding
- Unclear
- Large Human Trial
Introduction
This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial was conducted at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from March to September 2017.Methods
Eligible participants included adults aged 18 years and older, living in the community, diagnosed with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus according to ADA guidelines, capable of self-managing their diabetes, and able to visit the study site for follow-up. The intervention group received 25 ml of a probiotic beverage containing with over 10^8 CFU/mL of Lactobacillus, administered four times daily. An equal volume of inactivated Lactobacillus was administered to the control group and the control group was administered the same volume of inactivated Lactobacillus. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics on glycemic control and other diabetes-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes patients. The primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and FBG levels post-intervention. Investigators, participants, and study site personnel were blinded to the treatment allocation until the conclusion of the study. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-POR-17010850).Results
Of the 490 participants screened, 213 were randomized to either the probiotics group (n = 103) or the placebo group (n = 110). After 16 weeks of follow-up, the probiotic group showed reductions in HbA1c [-0.44 (-0.66 to -0.22)] and FBG [-0.97 (-1.49 to 0.46)] post-intervention, similar to the placebo group with reductions in HbA1c [-0.33 (-0.52 to -0.15)] and FBG [-0.90 (-1.32 to -0.47)], but these changes were not statistically significant in PP and ITT analyses (P>0.05). Adverse events were similarly distributed among groups, indicating comparable safety profiles.Discussion
Overall, 16-week probiotic supplementation showed no beneficial effects on glycemic control, lipid profiles, or weight.Clinical trial registration
https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=18421, identifier ChiCTR-POR-17010850.Research Insights
Overall, 16-week probiotic supplementation showed no beneficial effects on glycemic control, lipid profiles, or weight.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 25 ml of a probiotic beverage containing over 10^8 CFU/mL, four times daily
FBG [-0.97 (-1.49 to 0.46)] post-intervention, similar to the placebo group with reductions ... but these changes were not statistically significant in PP and ITT analyses (P>0.05).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 25 ml of a probiotic beverage containing over 10^8 CFU/mL, four times daily
the probiotic group showed reductions in HbA1c [-0.44 (-0.66 to -0.22)] ... similar to the placebo group ... but these changes were not statistically significant in PP and ITT analyses (P>0.05).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 25 ml of a probiotic beverage containing over 10^8 CFU/mL, four times daily
Overall, 16-week probiotic supplementation showed no beneficial effects on glycemic control, lipid profiles, or weight.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 25 ml of a probiotic beverage containing over 10^8 CFU/mL, four times daily
Adverse Events Reported
Adverse events were similarly distributed among groups, indicating comparable safety profiles.
- Finding
- Reported