Effects of Eight-Week Supplementation Containing Red Orange and Polypodium leucotomos Extracts on UVB-Induced Skin Responses: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.
- 2025-04-02
- Nutrients 17(7)
- Petra Keršmanc
- Tina Pogačnik
- Janko Žmitek
- Hristo Hristov
- Olga Točkova
- Katja Žmitek
- PubMed: 40218997
- DOI: 10.3390/nu17071240
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Population
- 54 fair-skinned participants (phototypes I-III)
- Methods
- Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 8 weeks of dietary intervention with a syrup supplement containing Polypodium leucotomos extract, Red Orange Extract, and vitamins A, C, D, and E
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Duration
- 8 weeks
- Rigorous Journal
Research Insights
the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not stated
a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not stated
ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not stated
the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not stated
a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not stated
ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not stated
the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not stated
a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not stated
ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not stated
the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not stated
a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not stated
ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not stated
the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not stated
a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not stated
ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not stated
the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not stated
a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not stated
ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not stated