Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Population
54 fair-skinned participants (phototypes I-III)
Methods
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 8 weeks of dietary intervention with a syrup supplement containing Polypodium leucotomos extract, Red Orange Extract, and vitamins A, C, D, and E
Blinding
Double-blind
Duration
8 weeks
  • Rigorous Journal
Background/Objectives: Oral photoprotection is gaining attention as a complementary approach to conventional sun protection. This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated the effects of an 8-week dietary intervention with a syrup supplement containing Polypodium leucotomos extract (PLE), Red Orange Extract (ROE), and vitamins A, C, D, and E on minimal erythema dose (MED), UVB-induced erythema (Δa*), and pigmentation changes (ΔMI). Methods: In total, 54 fair-skinned participants (phototypes I-III) were randomized into either the intervention (IP) or placebo group (n = 27 per group). MED, Δa*, and ΔMI were assessed at baseline after 2 and 8 weeks of supplementation. Results: Throughout the intervention, MED gradually increased, while Δa* decreased in the IP group. While these changes were not statistically significant after 2 weeks, they reached significance after 8 weeks of intervention. By the end of the study, the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm2; p < 0.05) and a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001). In contrast, ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that supplementation with PLE, ROE, and vitamins A, C, D, and E provides systemic photoprotection by enhancing UV tolerance and reducing erythema without affecting tanning response. This study supports oral supplementation as an adjunct to topical photoprotection, with prolonged use potentially yielding cumulative benefits.

Research Insights

  • the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    not stated
  • a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    not stated
  • ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    not stated
  • the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    not stated
  • a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    not stated
  • ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    not stated
  • the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    not stated
  • a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    not stated
  • ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    not stated
  • the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    not stated
  • a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    not stated
  • ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    not stated
  • the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    not stated
  • a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    not stated
  • ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    not stated
  • the IP group exhibited a significant 23.8% increase in MED (from 0.447 ± 0.096 to 0.553 ± 0.142 J/cm²; p < 0.05)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    not stated
  • a 46.2% reduction in erythema intensity (from 2.40 ± 0.94 to 1.29 ± 1.04 au; p < 0.0001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    not stated
  • ΔMI in the IP group (from 0.67 ± 0.81 to 0.82 ± 0.96 au) were comparable to those observed in the placebo group, with no significant differences between groups

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    not stated
Back to top