Efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- 2024-11
- Respiratory investigation 62(6)
- Hiroshi Ohnishi
- Takuya Tanimoto
- Ryunosuke Inaba
- Masamitsu Eitoku
- PubMed: 39413571
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2024.10.004
Study Design
- Type
- Meta-Analysis
- Population
- patients with stable COPD
- Methods
- systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; mucolytics including ambroxol, bromhexine, carbocisteine, erdosteine, fudosteine, l-methylcysteine, and N-acetylcysteine
Background
The efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis or exacerbations of COPD have been reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of mucolytics in patients with stable COPD.Methods
Reports from randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mucolytics, including ambroxol, bromhexine, carbocisteine, erdosteine, fudosteine, l-methylcysteine, and N-acetylcysteine used in patients with stable COPD were searched for in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Igaku Cyuo Zasshi database.Results
Twenty-three reports with ambroxol, carbocisteine, erdosteine, l-methylcysteine, or N-acetylcysteine were included in the review. Mucolytics significantly reduced the rates of exacerbation and hospitalization, shortened the duration of antibiotic use and exacerbations, prolonged the time to first exacerbation, and had a tendency to reduce the occurrence of two or more exacerbations in patients with stable COPD compared to placebo. Mucolytics did not improve mortality, number of lost workdays, scores on St. George's respiratory questionnaire, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, or forced vital capacity. The safety profile of mucolytics was comparable to that of placebo.Conclusions
Mucolytics reduce exacerbations and hospitalizations in patients with stable COPD and have a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.Research Insights
Mucolytics did not improve ... forced expiratory volume in 1 s
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Mucolytics did not improve ... forced vital capacity
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Mucolytics did not improve ... scores on St. George's respiratory questionnaire
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
prolonged the time to first exacerbation
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
shortened the duration of antibiotic use and exacerbations
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
shortened the duration of antibiotic use and exacerbations
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
had a tendency to reduce the occurrence of two or more exacerbations
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Mucolytics significantly reduced the rates of exacerbation and hospitalization
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
Mucolytics significantly reduced the rates of exacerbation and hospitalization
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
Mucolytics did not improve mortality
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Mucolytics did not improve ... number of lost workdays
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small