Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Evaluating the clinical evidence of TCM in Alzheimer's disease: an evidence map perspective.

  • 2025-08-29
  • Frontiers in neurology 16
    • Shuqi Cui
    • Yongli Zhao
    • Xiaowen Wang
    • Yingzi Huang
    • Jiaxi Ye
    • Ziyong Deng
    • Yanjiang Li
    • Hui Qin
    • Li Wang
    • Yan Li
    • Kaihua Wang
    • Guangshan Zheng
    • Qijing Qin

Study Design

Type
Systematic Review
Sample size
n = 100
Population
Alzheimer's Disease patients
Methods
Systematic searches across eight biomedical databases; integrated narrative-graphic synthesis
Duration
4-24 weeks

Objective

This systematic review aimed to synthesize current clinical evidence from randomized controlled trial (RCT) and meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of TCM in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Methods

Systematic searches across eight biomedical databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed) through October 26, 2024 yielded an evidence matrix, which was analyzed through integrated narrative-graphic synthesis.

Results

Our analysis encompassed 187 studies (141 RCTs and 46 systematic reviews/meta-analyses), demonstrating cyclical publication growth with recent contraction. Study characteristics included sample sizes of 50-100 participants and intervention durations of 4-24 weeks. Interventions included acupuncture, herbal decoctions, and proprietary medicines. Outcomes focused on clinical efficacy, scale scores, TCM syndrome scores, and safety. While TCM demonstrated therapeutic potential, prescription heterogeneity and diagnostic ambiguity constrained specificity. Methodological quality was generally low, with few high-quality systematic reviews or meta-analyses.

Conclusion

While TCM shows therapeutic potential in Alzheimer's disease, methodological limitations persist. Subsequent research requires enhanced trial designs with standardized outcome metrics and rigorous bias control protocols.

Research Insights

    Back to top