Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and prevalence of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of global data.

  • 2025-09-11
  • International journal of surgery (London, England) 112(1)
    • Mengqi Yang
    • Yujia Huo
    • Yedong Huang
    • Wenjun He
    • Qingyu Luo
    • Lin Zhang

Study Design

Type
Meta-Analysis
Population
1424 CRC cases and 1363 controls from 20 case-control studies
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (case-control and cross-sectional) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library through May 2025; random-effects meta-analysis with logit transformation; subgroup analyses and meta-regression; risk of bias assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV), a known oncogenic virus in cervical and anal cancers, has also been detected in colorectal tissues. However, evidence regarding its association with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains inconsistent. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this relationship.

Methods

Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through May 2025 for observational studies (case-control and cross-sectional) assessing HPV prevalence in CRC patients versus controls. Data extraction was performed in duplicate. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using random-effects models with logit transformation. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression examined the effects of geographic region, HPV genotype, detection method, and sample type. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Findings

Twenty case-control studies encompassing 1424 CRC cases and 1363 controls were included. The pooled OR for the association between HPV infection and CRC was 2.39 (95% CI: 1.69-3.09), with no significant heterogeneity ( I2 = 0%). Associations were strongest in Asian studies (OR = 3.73) and in those using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues (OR = 3.56). Studies targeting HPV16 alone yielded higher effect sizes than those evaluating mixed or unspecified genotypes. Meta-regression confirmed region and genotype group as significant effect modifiers. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness. Egger's test indicated marginal small-study bias ( P = 0.074), but funnel plot symmetry suggested no serious publication bias.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis confirms a significant link between HPV infection and colorectal cancer, suggesting HPV may play a broader oncogenic role beyond the anogenital tract. The findings highlight the need for genotype-aware, region-specific screening strategies, and support incorporating viral profiling into CRC prevention efforts, especially in underserved populations.

Research Insights

    Back to top