Improved gastrointestinal tolerance and iron status via probiotic use in iron deficiency anaemia patients initiating oral iron replacement: a randomised controlled trial.
- 2024-11-04
- The British journal of nutrition 132(10)
- Gokhan Koker
- Yasin Sahinturk
- Gulhan Ozcelik Koker
- Muhammed Ali Coskuner
- Merve Eren Durmus
- Mehmet Mutlu Catli
- Ayhan Hilmi Cekin
- PubMed: 39494607
- DOI: 10.1017/s0007114524002757
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 295
- Population
- 295 patents with newly diagnosed IDA
- Methods
- prospective randomised non-placebo-controlled study, IRT alone versus IRT plus L. plantarum 299v
- Blinding
- Open-label
- Duration
- 3-month IRT
- Funding
- Unclear
- Large Human Trial
Research Insights
IRT-Pro v. IRT-only group had significantly higher serum levels for iron (76·0 (51·0-96·0) v. 60·0(43·0-70·0) µg/dl, P < 0·001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not specified
and higher change from baseline Hb (0·9 (0·3-1·3) v. 0·4 (-0·1-1·1) g/dl, P < 0·001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- not specified
and transferrin saturation (20·1 (12·5-28·5) v. 14·5 (10·5-19·0) %, P < 0·001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- not specified
IRT-Pro group, when compared with IRT-only group, experienced significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal intolerance over the course of IRT (13·0 % v. 46·5 %, P < 0·001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not specified
and treatment discontinuation within the first 30 d (3·6 % v. 15·9 %, P < 0·001).
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- not specified
Adverse Events Reported
IRT-Pro group, when compared with IRT-only group, experienced significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal intolerance over the course of IRT (13·0 % v. 46·5 %, P < 0·001)
- Finding
- Reported
treatment discontinuation within the first 30 d (3·6 % v. 15·9 %, P < 0·001)
- Finding
- Reported