Influence of vitamin D supplementation on ovarian reserve as reflected by anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- 2026-05-11
- Frontiers in endocrinology 17
- Sitian Fang
- Yijia Li
- Xinyu Fan
- Liping Zheng
- PubMed: 42199796
- DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1832704
Study Design
- Type
- Meta-Analysis
- Sample size
- n = 992
- Population
- women of reproductive age
- Methods
- meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin D supplementation with placebo or no intervention on AMH
Background
Vitamin D has been implicated in ovarian physiology, yet its effect on ovarian reserve remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the influence of vitamin D supplementation on ovarian reserve as indicated by serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels.Methods
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI were searched for RCTs comparing vitamin D supplementation with placebo or no intervention on AMH in women of reproductive age. The pooled effect was summarized as standardized mean difference (SMD) using a random-effects model by incorporating the influence of potential heterogeneity.Results
Eleven RCTs with 992 women were included. Overall, vitamin D supplementation did not significantly affect serum AMH levels (SMD: -0.20; 95% CI: -0.48 to 0.08; p = 0.16), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 77%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed no significant effect in double-blind trials but a reduction in AMH in open-label trials (p for subgroup difference = 0.02). A significant interaction was observed according to baseline AMH level (p = 0.003), with a reduction in studies where baseline AMH > 6 ng/mL (SMD: -0.55; 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.23). No significant subgroup differences were found by age, baseline 25(OH)D, vitamin D dose, treatment duration, or assay method.Conclusions
Current randomized evidence suggests that vitamin D supplementation was not likely to alter AMH levels in reproductive-aged women overall. The certainty of evidence was moderate, and findings should be interpreted cautiously given substantial heterogeneity.Systematic review registration
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261329210.Research Insights
Overall, vitamin D supplementation did not significantly affect serum AMH levels (SMD: -0.20; 95% CI: -0.48 to 0.08; p = 0.16), with substantial heterogeneity.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small