Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Outcomes of Serum Food-Specific Immunoglobulin G 4 to Guide Elimination Diet in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

  • 2024-02-01
  • The American journal of gastroenterology 119(6)
    • Amanda Huoy Wen Lim
    • Benjamin Ngoi
    • Griffith B Perkins
    • Stephanie Wong
    • Gail Whitelock
    • Plinio Hurtado
    • Andrew Ruszkiewicz
    • Thanh-Thao Adriana Le
    • Pravin Hissaria
    • Nam Quoc Nguyen

Study Design

Type
Clinical Trial
Population
22 patients with active EoE and 13 controls
Methods
prospective, controlled, single tertiary center trial; serum FS-IgG4 titers, esophageal eosinophil counts, and dysphagia symptom questionnaire scores were assessed; participants with elevated FS-IgG4 commenced 6-week targeted elimination diet; repeat serum FS-IgG4 and endoscopic and histologic examination at 6-week follow-up
Duration
6-week
Funding
Unclear

Introduction

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is associated with atopy; however, recent studies have identified an association with food-specific immunoglobulin G 4 (FS-IgG 4 ) rather than immunoglobulin E antibodies. This study aimed to evaluate the role of serum FS-IgG 4 in guiding an elimination diet and its outcomes.

Methods

Patients with and without EoE were enrolled in a prospective, controlled, single tertiary center trial. Serum FS-IgG 4 titers, esophageal eosinophil counts, and dysphagia symptom questionnaire scores were assessed, and participants with elevated FS-IgG 4 (ImmunoCAP, cutoff of 10 mgA/L) commenced 6-week targeted elimination diet. Repeat serum FS-IgG 4 and endoscopic and histologic examination were performed at 6-week follow-up.

Results

Twenty-two patients with active EoE and 13 controls were recruited. Serum FS-IgG 4 to milk, wheat, soy, eggs, and nuts was significantly higher in EoE ( P = 0.0002, P = 0.002, P = 0.003, P = 0.012, and P < 0.001, respectively). Elevated serum FS-IgG 4 to 1 or more food groups (median 2) was identified in 21/22 (95.4%) patients with EoE; 20/21 underwent 6-week dietary elimination. Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 ( P = 0.0007) and 1 ( P = 0.002), respectively. Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field). Fall in median esophageal eosinophil count was not statistically significant (50 vs 23; P = 0.068). Serum FS-IgG 4 did not decline by 6-week follow-up.

Discussion

Serum FS-IgG 4 to milk, wheat, soy, egg, and nuts was present at higher levels in EoE, with targeted elimination resulting in 45% histologic remission rate. Serum FS-IgG 4 has potential as a noninvasive biomarker in EoE. When successful, FS-IgG 4 -led elimination diet can negate need for medications and be viewed more favorably by patients because of its smaller endoscopic burden compared with empirical elimination diets.

Research Insights

  • Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Fall in median esophageal eosinophil count was not statistically significant (50 vs 23; P = 0.068).

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Serum FS-IgG4 did not decline by 6-week follow-up.

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Fall in median esophageal eosinophil count was not statistically significant (50 vs 23; P = 0.068).

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Serum FS-IgG4 did not decline by 6-week follow-up.

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 (P = 0.0007) and 1 (P = 0.002), respectively.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Fall in median esophageal eosinophil count was not statistically significant (50 vs 23; P = 0.068).

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Serum FS-IgG4 did not decline by 6-week follow-up.

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    targeted elimination
  • Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Moderate
    Dose
    targeted elimination
Back to top