Predominance of a bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus salivarius component of a five-strain probiotic in the porcine ileum and effects on host immune phenotype.
- 2008-05
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology 64(2)
- PubMed: 18373687
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00454.x
Study Design
- Type
- Clinical Trial
- Population
- Weaned pigs
- Methods
- Controlled experimental study
- Highly Cited
- Animal Study
Abstract
Relative predominance of each of five probiotic strains was investigated in the ileum of weaned pigs, compared with that in feces, when administered in combination at c. 5 x 10(9) CFU day(-1) for 28 days. Probiotic was excreted at 10(6)-10(9) CFU g(-1) feces, while ileal survival ranged from 10(2) to 10(6) CFU g(-1) digesta. In contrast to the feces, where Lactobacillus murinus DPC6002 predominated, the bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus salivarus DPC6005 dominated over coadministered strains both in the ileum digesta and in mucosa. Probiotic administration did not alter counts of culturable fecal Lactobacillus or Enterobacteriaceae but higher ileal Enterobacteriaceae were observed in the ileal digesta of probiotic-fed pigs (P<0.05). We observed decreased CD25 induction on T cells and monocytes (P<0.01) and decreased CTLA-4 induction (P<0.05) by the mitogen phytohemagglutinin on CD4 T cells from the probiotic group. Probiotic treatment also increased the proportion of CD4+ CD8+ T cells within the peripheral T-cell population and increased ileal IL-8 mRNA expression (P<0.05). In conclusion, superior ileal survival of L. salivarius compared with the other coadministered probiotics may be due to a competitive advantage conferred by its bacteriocin. The findings also suggest that the five-strain combination may function as a probiotic, at least in part, via immunomodulation.
Research Insights
| Supplement | Dose | Health Outcome | Effect Type | Effect Size | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactobacillus salivarius SD-5208 | — | Increased CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Proportion | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceProbiotic treatment also increased the proportion of CD4+ CD8+ T cells within the peripheral T-cell population. |
| Lactobacillus salivarius SD-5208 | — | Reduced CTLA-4 Induction on CD4 T Cells | Harmful | Small | View sourceWe observed...decreased CTLA-4 induction (P<0.05) by the mitogen phytohemagglutinin on CD4 T cells from the probiotic group. |
| Lactobacillus salivarius UALb-07 | — | Increased CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Proportion | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceProbiotic treatment also increased the proportion of CD4+ CD8+ T cells within the peripheral T-cell population. |
| Lactobacillus salivarius UALb-07 | — | Increased Ileal Enterobacteriaceae Counts | Harmful | Small | View source...higher ileal Enterobacteriaceae were observed in the ileal digesta of probiotic-fed pigs (P<0.05). |
| Lactobacillus salivarius UALs07 | — | Increased CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Proportion | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceProbiotic treatment also increased the proportion of CD4+ CD8+ T cells within the peripheral T-cell population. |
| Lactobacillus salivarius UALs07 | — | Increased Ileal Enterobacteriaceae Counts | Harmful | Small | View source...higher ileal Enterobacteriaceae were observed in the ileal digesta of probiotic-fed pigs (P<0.05). |
| Lactobacillus salivarius UALs07 | — | Reduced CTLA-4 Expression on CD4 T Cells | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceDecreased CTLA-4 induction (P<0.05) by the mitogen phytohemagglutinin on CD4 T cells from the probiotic group |
| Lactobacillus salivarius UALs07 | — | Reduced CTLA-4 Induction on CD4 T Cells | Harmful | Small | View sourceWe observed...decreased CTLA-4 induction (P<0.05) by the mitogen phytohemagglutinin on CD4 T cells from the probiotic group. |