Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

  • 2025-07-11
  • Nutrition reviews 83(11)
    • Petrana Martinekova
    • Mahmoud Obeidat
    • Mihaela Topala
    • Szilárd Váncsa
    • Dániel Sándor Veres
    • Ádám Zolcsák
    • Miheller Pál
    • László Földvári-Nagy
    • Peter Banovcin
    • Bálint Erőss
    • Péter Hegyi
    • Krisztina Hagymasi

Study Design

Type
Meta-Analysis
Sample size
n = 4,084
Population
patients with chronic liver disease (46 RCTs, comprising 4084 patients)
Methods
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library on July 2, 2024

Context

Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in chronic liver disease. Although international societies recommend vitamin D supplementation in cases of proven deficiency, the impact of vitamin D on chronic liver disease remains uncertain.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation in patients with chronic liver disease by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Data sources

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library on July 2, 2024.

Data extraction

Our primary outcomes involved survival, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and effects on changes in liver enzymes. Secondary outcomes included lipid profile and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), among others. The pooled risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using the random-effects model.

Data analysis

Forty-six RCTs were included, comprising 4084 patients. When we compared the vitamin D group with the control, the RR for overall survival was 1.14 (95% CI, 0.85-1.54; 4 RCTs) at 6 months and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.83-1.17; 4 RCTs) at the 12-month follow-up. Vitamin D supplementation did not result in a lower CAP (MD, -23.50 dB/m; 95% CI, -81.72 to 34.72; 3 RCTs) and LSM (MD, -0.65 kPa; 95% CI, -1.98 to 0.68; 3 RCTs). A significant reduction in HOMA-IR was observed in the vitamin D group (MD, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.01; 15 RCTs). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (MD, -4.98 IU/L; 95% CI, -8.28 to -1.68; 24 RCTs), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (MD, -3.33 IU/L; 95% CI, -6.25 to -0.40; 23 RCTs), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (MD, -5.14 IU/L; -6.40; -3.88; 11 RCTs), triglycerides (MD, -7.59 mg/dL; 95% CI, -15.09 to -0.81), and insulin (MD -0.79 μIU/L; 95% CI, -1.36 to -0.21) were significantly reduced in the patients with vitamin D supplementation.

Conclusion

Our results showed significantly reduced ALT, AST, GGT, triglycerides, insulin, and HOMA-IR in the vitamin D-supplemented group; however, the effect was modest. In addition, there were no differences in survival, CAP, or LSM. Further RCTs with adequate power are warranted to clarify the results.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022370312.

Research Insights

    Back to top