The clinical efficacy of Olibanum gum chewing in patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer disease: A randomized Parallel-Design controlled trial.
- 2023-12-08
- Neuropsychopharmacology reports 44(1)
- Fereshteh Ghorat
- Mahdi Sepidarkish
- Farzaneh Saadattalab
- Maedeh Rezghi
- Shamim Shahrestani
- Maryam Gholamalizadeh
- Saeid Doaei
- PubMed: 38069542
- DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12398
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 72
- Population
- 72 participants aged 50-75 years with Alzheimer's disease
- Methods
- Double-blind, randomized clinical trial; intervention group received 1.6 g/day of olibanum chewing gum for 18 weeks, placebo group received chewing gum without olibanum
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Duration
- 18 weeks
- Funding
- Unclear
Background
Alzheimer's disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder in elderly with progressive decline in cognitive functions. This study aimed to investigate the possible memory-improving effects of Olibanum on patients with Alzheimer's disease.Research design and method
This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out on 72 participants aged 50-75 years. The intervention group (n = 36) received 1.6 g/day of olibanum chewing gum for 18 weeks. The placebo group (n = 36) received chewing gum without olibanum. Neuropsychological assessments were performed at baseline, every 4 weeks, and after 18 weeks of the intervention.Results
There was no significant difference between (MD: 0.84, 95%CI: -1.10 to 2.78, p = 0.392) at baseline. Both groups had linear improvements over time. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding the improvements after the intervention (F = 0.157, p = 0.693). There were no significant differences between the groups for MMSE score (Mini-Mental State Examination) after the intervention (F = 0.141, p = 0.708).Conclusions
This study revealed that 18 weeks of gum chewing with Olibanum did not change the neuropsychological status. More clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.Research Insights
There was no significant difference between two groups regarding the improvements after the intervention (F = 0.157, p = 0.693). There were no significant differences between the groups for MMSE score after the intervention (F = 0.141, p = 0.708).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 1.6 g/day