Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

The effect of Nigella sativa supplementation on glycemic status in adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

  • 2024-10
  • Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators 174
    • Shabnam Shirvani
    • Maryam Falahatzadeh
    • Elham Oveili
    • Mehrdad Jamali
    • Pedram Pam
    • Maryam Parang
    • Mehrnaz Shakarami

Study Design

Type
Meta-Analysis
Sample size
n = 30
Population
adults
Methods
systematic literature search up to December 2023 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify eligible RCTs; random effects models based on heterogeneity tests; pooled data as weighted mean differences with 95% CI
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sought to evaluate the effects of Nigella sativa (N. sativa) consumption on glycemic index in adults. A systematic literature search up to December 2023 was completed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify eligible RCTs. Random effects models were assessed based on the heterogeneity tests, and pooled data were determined as weighted mean differences with a 95 % confidence interval. Finally, a total of 30 studies were found to be eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled results using random effects model indicated that N. sativa supplementation significantly reduced FBS (SMD: -1.71; 95 % CI: -2.11, -1.31, p <0.001; I2= 92.7 %, p-heterogeneity <0.001) and HA1c levels (SMD: -2.16; 95 % CI: -3.04, -1.29, p <0.001; I2= 95.7 %, p-heterogeneity <0.001) but not effect on insulin (SMD = 0.48; 95 % CI: -0.53, 1.48, P = 0.353; I2= 96.1 %, p-heterogeneity <0.001), and HOMA-IR (SMD: -0.56; 95 % CI: -1.47, 0.35, p=0.229; I2= 95.0 %, p-heterogeneity <0.001).Overall, the evidence supports the consumption of N. sativa to reduce FBS and HA1c levels. Additional research, featuring extended durations and robust study designs, is necessary to determine the ideal dosage and duration of N. sativa supplementation for achieving a positive impact on glycemic markers.

Research Insights

  • but not effect on insulin (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI: -0.53, 1.48, P = 0.353; I²= 96.1%, p-heterogeneity <0.001)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • N. sativa supplementation significantly reduced FBS (SMD: -1.71; 95% CI: -2.11, -1.31, p <0.001; I²= 92.7%, p-heterogeneity <0.001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
  • and HOMA-IR (SMD: -0.56; 95% CI: -1.47, 0.35, p=0.229; I²= 95.0%, p-heterogeneity <0.001)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • N. sativa supplementation significantly reduced ... HA1c levels (SMD: -2.16; 95% CI: -3.04, -1.29, p <0.001; I²= 95.7%, p-heterogeneity <0.001)

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Large
Back to top