Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Tolerance development in cow's milk-allergic infants receiving amino acid-based formula: A randomized controlled trial.

  • 2022-02
  • The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 149(2)
    • Pantipa Chatchatee
    • Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
    • Lars Lange
    • Suwat Benjaponpitak
    • Kok Wee Chong
    • Pasuree Sangsupawanich
    • Marleen T J van Ampting
    • Manon M Oude Nijhuis
    • Lucien F Harthoorn
    • Jane E Langford
    • Jan Knol
    • Karen Knipping
    • Johan Garssen
    • Valerie Trendelenburg
    • Robert Pesek
    • Carla M Davis
    • Antonella Muraro
    • Mich Erlewyn-Lajeunesse
    • Adam T Fox
    • Louise J Michaelis
    • Kirsten Beyer

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Sample size
n = 89
Population
infants aged ≤13 months with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy
Methods
Multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study; subjects randomized to receive AAF-S or AAF for 12 months; tolerance evaluated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at 12 and 24 months
Blinding
Double-blind
Duration
12 months

Background

Tolerance development is an important clinical outcome for infants with cow's milk allergy.

Objective

This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study (NTR3725) evaluated tolerance development to cow's milk (CM) and safety of an amino acid-based formula (AAF) including synbiotics (AAF-S) comprising prebiotic oligosaccharides (oligofructose, inulin) and probiotic Bifidobacterium breve M-16V in infants with confirmed IgE-mediated CM allergy.

Methods

Subjects aged ≤13 months with IgE-mediated CM allergy were randomized to receive AAF-S (n = 80) or AAF (n = 89) for 12 months. Stratification was based on CM skin prick test wheal size and study site. After 12 and 24 months, CM tolerance was evaluated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. A logistic regression model used the all-subjects randomized data set.

Results

At baseline, mean ± SD age was 9.36 ± 2.53 months. At 12 and 24 months, respectively, 49% and 62% of subjects were CM tolerant (AAF-S 45% and 64%; AAF 52% and 59%), and not differ significantly between groups. During the 12-month intervention, the number of subjects reporting at least 1 adverse event did not significantly differ between groups; however, fewer subjects required hospitalization due to serious adverse events categorized as infections in the AAF-S versus AAF group (9% vs 20%; P = .036).

Conclusions

After 12 and 24 months, CM tolerance was not different between groups and was in line with natural outgrowth. Results suggest that during the intervention, fewer subjects receiving AAF-S required hospitalization due to infections.

Research Insights

Adverse Events Reported

  • Bifidobacterium breve M-16Vinfection-related hospitalization

    fewer subjects required hospitalization due to serious adverse events categorized as infections in the AAF-S versus AAF group (9% vs 20%; P = .036)

    Finding
    Reported
    Severity
    Serious adverse event
    Magnitude
    9% vs 20%
    Significant
    Yes
Back to top