Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Treatment assignment guesses by study participants in a double-blind dose escalation clinical trial of saw palmetto.

  • 2014-01
  • Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) 20(1)
    • Jeannette Y Lee
    • Page Moore
    • John Kusek
    • Michael Barry

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Sample size
n = 155
Population
men, 45 years and older, with moderate to low severe BPH symptoms, randomized to saw palmetto (N=151) or placebo (N=155)
Methods
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; participants instructed to take one 320 mg gelcap daily for first 24 weeks, two 320 mg gelcaps daily for second 24 weeks, three 320 mg gelcaps daily for third 24 weeks; matching placebo gelcaps for same periods
Blinding
Double-blind
Duration
72 weeks
  • Large Human Trial

Objectives

This report assesses participant perception of treatment assignment in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of saw palmetto for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BCM).

Design

Participants randomized to receive saw palmetto were instructed to take one 320 mg gelcap daily for the first 24 weeks, two 320 mg gelcaps daily for the second 24 weeks, and three 320 mg gelcaps daily for the third 24 weeks. Study participants assigned to placebo were instructed to take the same number of matching placebo gelcaps in each time period. At 24, 48, and 72 weeks postrandomization, the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) was administered and participants were asked to guess their treatment assignment.

Settings

The study was conducted at 11 clinical centers in North America.

Participants

Study participants were men, 45 years and older, with moderate to low severe BPH symptoms, randomized to saw palmetto (N=151) or placebo (N=155).

Outcome measures

Treatment arms were compared with respect to the distribution of participant guesses of treatment assignment.

Results

For participants assigned to saw palmetto, 22.5%, 24.7%, and 29.8% correctly thought they were taking saw palmetto, and 37.3%, 40.0%, and 44.4% incorrectly thought they were on placebo at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. For placebo participants, 21.8%, 27.4%, and 25.2% incorrectly thought they were on saw palmetto, and 41.6%, 39.9%, and 42.6% correctly thought they were on placebo at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. The treatment arms did not vary with respect to the distributions of participants who guessed they were on saw palmetto (p=0.823) or placebo (p=0.893). Participants who experienced an improvement in AUA-SI were 2.16 times more likely to think they were on saw palmetto.

Conclusions

Blinding of treatment assignment was successful in this study. Improvement in BPH-related symptoms was associated with the perception that participants were taking saw palmetto.

Research Insights

  • Participants who experienced an improvement in AUA-SI were 2.16 times more likely to think they were on saw palmetto.

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    one 320 mg gelcap daily for the first 24 weeks, two 320 mg gelcaps daily for the second 24 weeks, and three 320 mg gelcaps daily for the third 24 weeks
Back to top