Whey protein and male acne: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
- 2024-01-31
- The Journal of dermatology 51(7)
- Kittithorn Sompochpruetikul
- Thanon Khongcharoensombat
- Yuda Chongpison
- Wattanai Rittirongwattana
- Pravit Asawanonda
- Nopadon Noppakun
- Chanat Kumtornrut
- PubMed: 38291989
- DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.17109
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 25
- Population
- men with mild to moderate facial and/or truncal acne
- Methods
- noninferiority trial, after randomization, intervention group took daily WP 30 g with a non-WP nutritional supplement 18 g, control group took a non-WP nutritional supplement 46 g
- Duration
- 6-month
Background
Acne vulgaris (AV) exacerbation after whey protein (WP) consumption remains inconclusive among experts.Objectives
To investigate the association between WP consumption and acne severity in men with acne.Methods
A noninferiority trial was conducted in men with mild to moderate facial and/or truncal acne. After randomization, participants in an intervention group took daily WP 30 g with a non-WP nutritional supplement 18 g (WP group, n = 25), while the control group took a non-WP nutritional supplement 46 g (non-WP group, n = 24). At each follow-up appointment, investigators evaluated acne count (total acne lesions, comedonal lesions, and inflammatory lesions) and severity.Results
Forty-nine participants had a mean age of 19.7 years (standard deviation [SD], 0.9) and 20.3 years (SD, 1.4) in the WP and non-WP groups, respectively. The mean differences in the facial and truncal total acne lesions for the WP and non-WP group were -5.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.18 to 1.19, p = 0.09) and -2.18 (95% CI, -11.83 to 7.48, p = 0.65), respectively. For severity changes, only one (4.3%) participant in the non-WP group reported an increase in the Investigator Global Assessment scale of at least two levels.Conclusions
In this 6-month trial, men with acne who undertook WP supplementation showed a noninferior difference in the changes in total acne lesions and severity of facial and truncal acne compared with the non-WP group.Research Insights
For severity changes, only one (4.3%) participant in the non-WP group reported an increase in the Investigator Global Assessment scale of at least two levels.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 30 g/day
The mean differences in the facial and truncal total acne lesions for the WP and non-WP group were -5.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.18 to 1.19, p = 0.09) and -2.18 (95% CI, -11.83 to 7.48, p = 0.65), respectively.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 30 g/day
The mean differences in the facial and truncal total acne lesions for the WP and non-WP group were -5.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.18 to 1.19, p = 0.09) and -2.18 (95% CI, -11.83 to 7.48, p = 0.65), respectively.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 30 g/day