Clinical and radiological assessment of grape seed extract versus mineral trioxide aggregates in primary molar pulpotomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
- 2025-09-26
- Medicine 104(39)
- Noura Mohammed Bakr
- Gihan Adel Balbola
- Soha Fuad Alqadi
- Najla Dar-Odeh
- Shadia Elsayed
- Nuha Alghamdi
- Nisreen Nabiel Hassan
- Sara N Hashem
- Safaa Ramadan El Sayed
- PubMed: 41029033
- DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000044827
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 32
- Population
- 32 primary teeth
- Methods
- prospective split-mouth randomized clinical study; MTA used in group I, GSE used in group II
- Duration
- 6 months
Background
This study aimed to assess the radiological and clinical outcomes of mineral trioxide aggregates (MTA) versus grape seed extract (GSE) when used as a dressing material in primary teeth undergoing pulpotomy.Methods
This was a prospective split-mouth randomized clinical study. A total of 32 primary teeth were included and split into 2 groups: MTA was used in group I, and GSE was used in group II. A clinical and radiographic follow-up was conducted for 6 months postoperatively. Periapical radiographs were taken for all treated teeth at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Radiographic criteria for clinical success included absence of internal resorption, pathologic external resorption, interradicular radiolucency, periapical radiolucency, and widening of the periodontal ligament space.Result
In the MTA group, clinical and radiographic success was 100% at 1 and 3 months, in comparison to 93.75% 6 months postoperatively. In the GSE group, clinical success was 100% 1 month, and 93.75% 3 and 6 months postoperatively, while radiographic success was 100% at 3 months, 87.5% 6 months postoperatively. There were no significant statistical differences in the overall clinical or radiographic outcomes between the study groups (P > .05).Conclusion
Both MTA and GSE are associated with successful clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomy; however, MTA seems to be associated with reduced inflammatory reactions, rendering it more effective than GSE.Research Insights
In the GSE group, clinical success was 100% 1 month, and 93.75% 3 and 6 months postoperatively. There were no significant statistical differences in the overall clinical or radiographic outcomes between the study groups (P > .05).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
radiographic success was 100% at 3 months, 87.5% 6 months postoperatively. There were no significant statistical differences in the overall clinical or radiographic outcomes between the study groups (P > .05).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small