Effects of Probiotic Short-Term Regiment on Oral Health Parameters in Children: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
- 2025-11-18
- Nutrients 17(22)
- Edouard Starck
- Vanessa Machado
- João Botelho
- Luís Proença
- Helena Barroso
- Carla Ascenso
- Cecília Rozan
- PubMed: 41305654
- DOI: 10.3390/nu17223604
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 40
- Population
- 40 children aged 6-14 years from a community setting
- Methods
- double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial; probiotic or placebo lozenges for 30 days
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Duration
- 30 days
- Funding
- Unclear
- Rigorous Journal
Research Insights
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Despite there being no statistically significant differences in any clinical or microbiological parameter (p > 0.05), we found trends toward higher salivary pH, improved buffering capacity, and reduced S. mutans counts in the probiotic group.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Adverse Events Reported
The intervention was well tolerated, with no adverse events reported and high participant acceptability.
- Finding
- Reported
The intervention was well tolerated, with no adverse events reported and high participant acceptability.
- Finding
- Reported