Effects of Whole Milk Supplementation on Gut Microbiota and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Subjects with and without Lactose Malabsorption.
- 2018-10-02
- Nutrients 10(10)
- Xiaoqin Li
- Jiawei Yin
- Yalun Zhu
- Xiaoqian Wang
- Xiaoli Hu
- Wei Bao
- Yue Huang
- Liangkai Chen
- Sijing Chen
- Wei Yang
- Zhilei Shan
- Liegang Liu
- PubMed: 30279333
- DOI: 10.3390/nu10101403
Study Design
- Type
- Clinical Trial
- Population
- 31 LM and 31 LA, 1:1 matched by age, sex, body mass index, and daily dairy intake
- Methods
- pair-wise intervention study, 250 mL/day whole milk for four weeks
- Blinding
- Open-label
- Duration
- four weeks
- Funding
- Unclear
- Rigorous Journal
The aim of this study was to compare the impact of whole milk supplementation on gut microbiota and cardiometabolic biomarkers between lactose malabsorbers (LM) and absorbers (LA). We performed a pair-wise intervention study of 31 LM and 31 LA, 1:1 matched by age, sex, body mass index, and daily dairy intake. Subjects were required to add 250 mL/day whole milk for four weeks in their routine diet. At the beginning and the end of the intervention period, we collected data on gut microbiota and cardiometabolic biomarkers. Whole milk supplementation significantly increased Actinobacteria (P < 0.01), Bifidobacterium (P < 0.01), Anaerostipe (P < 0.01), and Blautia (P = 0.04), and decreased Megamonas (P = 0.04) in LM, but not LA. Microbial richness and diversity were not affected. The fecal levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) remained stable throughout the study. Body fat mass (P < 0.01) and body fat percentage (P < 0.01) reduced in both groups, but the changes did not differ between groups. No significant differences in other cardiometabolic markers were found between LM and LA. When compared with LA, whole milk supplementation could alter the intestinal microbiota composition in LM, without significant changes in fecal SCFAs and cardiometabolic biomarkers.
Research Insights
The fecal levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) remained stable throughout the study.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 250 mL/day
Body fat mass (P < 0.01) and body fat percentage (P < 0.01) reduced in both groups, but the changes did not differ between groups.
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 250 mL/day
Body fat mass (P < 0.01) and body fat percentage (P < 0.01) reduced in both groups, but the changes did not differ between groups.
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 250 mL/day