Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii as an adjuvant therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a meta-analysis.
- 2025-02-12
- Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 15
- Manning Li
- Ying Xie
- PubMed: 40012609
- DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1441185
Study Design
- Type
- Meta-Analysis
- Population
- patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
- Methods
- systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies with 5,036 cases; searched PubMed and Web of Science from January 2002 to January 2023; addition of Saccharomyces boulardii to traditional therapy
Background
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is highly prevalent worldwide and is closely associated with many gastric conditions. Current methods for eradicating H. pylori include triple or quadruple therapy, including antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and bismuth agents; however, with antibiotic abuse and increased drug resistance rates, the effectiveness of traditional methods is gradually decreasing, with many adverse effects such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and intolerance. In recent years, there has been controversy regarding whether adding Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) to traditional therapies is beneficial for eradicating H. pylori.Aim
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S. boulardii as an adjuvant therapy for the eradication of H. pylori.Methods
We systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2002 to January 2023. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary outcomes included total adverse effects, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloating, constipation, nausea, vomiting, taste disorders, and other adverse reactions. We evaluated the included studies for publication bias and heterogeneity. Fixed- and random-effects models were used for studies without and with heterogeneity, respectively, to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) and conduct sensitivity and subgroup analyses.Results
Nineteen studies comprising 5,036 cases of H. pylori infection were included in this meta-analysis. The addition of S. boulardii to traditional therapy significantly improved the H. pylori eradication rate [RR=1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.15] and reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66), diarrhea (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48), abdominal distension (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72), constipation (RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57), and nausea (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68). However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.Conclusions
S. boulardii supplementation in traditional eradication therapy significantly improves the H. pylori eradication rate and reduces the total adverse effects and incidence of diarrhea, bloating, constipation, and nausea.Systematic review registration
Prospero, identifier CRD42024549780.Research Insights
The addition of S. boulardii to traditional therapy significantly improved the H. pylori eradication rate [RR=1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.15]
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Small
reduced the incidence of ... abdominal distension (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
reduced the incidence of ... constipation (RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
reduced the incidence of ... diarrhea (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
reduced the incidence of ... nausea (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
it did not reduce the occurrence of ... taste disorders
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
it did not reduce the occurrence of ... vomiting
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
Adverse Events Reported
The addition of S. boulardii to traditional therapy significantly improved the H. pylori eradication rate [RR=1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.15] and reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66)
- Finding
- No significant difference
abdominal distension (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72)
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Magnitude
- RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72
- Significant
- Yes
However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Significant
- No
constipation (RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57)
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Magnitude
- RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57
- Significant
- Yes
reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66), diarrhea (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48)
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Magnitude
- RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48
- Significant
- Yes
nausea (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68)
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Magnitude
- RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68
- Significant
- Yes
However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Significant
- No
However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Significant
- No