Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Study Design

Type
Meta-Analysis
Population
patients with Helicobacter pylori infection
Methods
systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies with 5,036 cases; searched PubMed and Web of Science from January 2002 to January 2023; addition of Saccharomyces boulardii to traditional therapy

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is highly prevalent worldwide and is closely associated with many gastric conditions. Current methods for eradicating H. pylori include triple or quadruple therapy, including antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and bismuth agents; however, with antibiotic abuse and increased drug resistance rates, the effectiveness of traditional methods is gradually decreasing, with many adverse effects such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and intolerance. In recent years, there has been controversy regarding whether adding Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) to traditional therapies is beneficial for eradicating H. pylori.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S. boulardii as an adjuvant therapy for the eradication of H. pylori.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2002 to January 2023. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary outcomes included total adverse effects, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloating, constipation, nausea, vomiting, taste disorders, and other adverse reactions. We evaluated the included studies for publication bias and heterogeneity. Fixed- and random-effects models were used for studies without and with heterogeneity, respectively, to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) and conduct sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Results

Nineteen studies comprising 5,036 cases of H. pylori infection were included in this meta-analysis. The addition of S. boulardii to traditional therapy significantly improved the H. pylori eradication rate [RR=1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.15] and reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66), diarrhea (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48), abdominal distension (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72), constipation (RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57), and nausea (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68). However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.

Conclusions

S. boulardii supplementation in traditional eradication therapy significantly improves the H. pylori eradication rate and reduces the total adverse effects and incidence of diarrhea, bloating, constipation, and nausea.

Systematic review registration

Prospero, identifier CRD42024549780.

Research Insights

Adverse Events Reported

  • saccharomyces boulardiiOverall tolerability

    The addition of S. boulardii to traditional therapy significantly improved the H. pylori eradication rate [RR=1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.15] and reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66)

    Finding
    No significant difference
  • saccharomyces boulardiiabdominal distension

    abdominal distension (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72)

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Magnitude
    RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72
    Significant
    Yes
  • saccharomyces boulardiiabdominal pain

    However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Significant
    No
  • constipation (RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57)

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Magnitude
    RR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.57
    Significant
    Yes
  • reduced the incidence of total adverse effects (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.66), diarrhea (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48)

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Magnitude
    RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48
    Significant
    Yes
  • nausea (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68)

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Magnitude
    RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68
    Significant
    Yes
  • saccharomyces boulardiitaste disorders

    However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Significant
    No
  • However, it did not reduce the occurrence of abdominal pain, vomiting, or taste disorders.

    Finding
    No significant difference
    Significant
    No
Back to top