Leucine supplementation does not attenuate the decline in daily muscle protein synthesis rates or preserve leg muscle mass during leg immobilization in young or older adults: a double-blind randomized trial.
- 2026-04
- The American journal of clinical nutrition 123(4)
- Tyler A Churchward-Venne
- Philippe Jm Pinckaers
- Joey Sj Smeets
- Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr
- Stefan Hm Gorissen
- Cas J Fuchs
- Joan M Senden
- Joy Pb Goessens
- Annemie P Gijsen
- Will Kwh Wodzig
- Luc Jc van Loon
- PubMed: 41580240
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2026.101205
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Population
- 24 young (23 ± 4 y) and 24 older (69 ± 4 y) recreationally active adults
- Methods
- randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design; 3 d of unilateral knee immobilization (leg casting) and received a leucine or energy-matched carbohydrate supplement
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Duration
- 3 d
Background
Muscle disuse leads to muscle atrophy that has been attributed to declines in basal and postprandial muscle protein synthesis (MPS) rates. Leucine regulates MPS and may attenuate disuse-induced declines in MPS rates and muscle mass.Objectives
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capacity of leucine supplementation to attenuate disuse-induced declines in MPS rates and muscle mass in young and older adults.Methods
In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design, 24 young (23 ± 4 y) and 24 older (69 ± 4 y) recreationally active adults (equal sex distribution) underwent 3 d of unilateral knee immobilization (leg casting) and received a leucine [group of adult study participants who supplemented with 5 g of leucine 3 × daily with each main meal during 3 d of unilateral knee immobilization by means of a full leg cast (LEU)] or energy-matched carbohydrate [group of adult study participants who supplemented with 5 g of carbohydrate 3 × daily with each main meal during 3 d of unilateral knee immobilization by means of a full leg cast (PLA)] supplement. Preimmobilization and postimmobilization, quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was assessed in the immobilized (IM) and nonimmobilized (NO-IM) leg by computed tomography. MPS rates were assessed in both legs during immobilization via 2H2O coupled with saliva, blood, and muscle biopsy sampling.Results
In young and older adults, MPS rates were ∼15% and ∼23% lower in the IM compared with NO-IM leg (1.28 ± 0.29 compared with 1.50 ± 0.26 and 1.10 ± 0.16 compared with 1.46 ± 0.28%/d, respectively; leg: both P < 0.001), with no differences between LEU compared with PLA treatments (treatment: P = 0.932 and P = 0.742, respectively). CSA decreased by ∼1.2% and ∼1.1% in the IM leg in young and older adults (from 7162 ± 1148 to 7076 ± 1129 mm2 and from 5813 ± 1092 to 5750 ± 1096 mm2, respectively; leg × time interaction: both P < 0.001), with no differences between LEU compared with PLA (treatment: P = 0.374 and P = 0.998). IM leg MPS rates were lower in older compared with young adults [difference: -0.18 (95% confidence interval: -0.31, -0.04) %/d; P = 0.013]. No differences were observed in the absolute (mm2) or relative (%) decline in CSA between young and older adults (both P > 0.05).Conclusions
Leucine supplementation does not attenuate the decline in daily MPS rates or muscle mass during short-term limb immobilization in young or older adults. Clinical Trial Register No. (Netherlands Trial Register): NL-OMON45771.Research Insights
MPS rates were ∼15% and ∼23% lower in the IM compared with NO-IM leg … with no differences between LEU compared with PLA treatments (treatment: P = 0.932 and P = 0.742, respectively).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 5 g 3 × daily with each main meal
CSA decreased by ∼1.2% and ∼1.1% in the IM leg … with no differences between LEU compared with PLA (treatment: P = 0.374 and P = 0.998).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 5 g 3 × daily with each main meal