Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Pillser
Search
Sign UpLog In

Malate or Not? Acute Effects of L-Citrulline Versus Citrulline Malate on Neuromuscular Performance in Young, Trained Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.

  • 2025-03-01
  • International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 35(2)
    • Juan J Martín-Olmedo
    • Sergio Miras-Moreno
    • Kevin Cuadra-Montes
    • Amador García-Ramos
    • Jonatan R Ruiz
    • Lucas Jurado-Fasoli

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Sample size
n = 21
Population
43 (21 women; 24.2 ± 3.7 years) young, trained men and women
Methods
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial; participants ingested placebo, CIT (5.3 g of CIT), or CMA (5.3 g of CIT, 2.7 g of malate) 45 min before three experimental sessions
Blinding
Double-blind
L-citrulline (CIT) supplementation seems to improve resistance training performance; yet, whether malate has additive ergogenic effects when combined with CIT is unknown. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial aimed to compare the acute effects of CIT versus citrulline malate (CMA) supplementation on neuromuscular performance and exertion and emotional perceptions in young, trained men and women. 43 (21 women; 24.2 ± 3.7 years) participants ingested a placebo, CIT (5.3 g of CIT), or CMA (5.3 g of CIT, 2.7 g of malate) 45 min before three experimental sessions in a counterbalanced manner. We evaluated the upper and lower limb maximal neuromuscular and ballistic performance through the two-point method and countermovement jump. Strength-endurance was assessed across three sets of 10 repetitions in the squat and bench press exercises. Exertion and emotional perceptions were evaluated before and after the assessment and during the strength-endurance assessment. CIT and CMA supplementation did not enhance maximal neuromuscular performance (all p ≥ .061, ηp2≤.066), or ballistic strength (all p ≥ .348, ηp2≤.025). Neither CIT nor CMA supplementation improved strength-endurance as observed in the total number of repetitions (all p ≥ .590, ηp2≤.013), repetitions before reaching velocity loss threshold (all p ≥ .623, ηp2≤.010), mean velocity (all p ≥ .792, ηp2≤.004), mean velocity decline (all p ≥ .293, ηp2≤.029), and mean velocity maintenance (all p ≥ .393 ηp2≤.022), or exertion and emotional perceptions (both p ≥ .306, ηp2≤.028). In conclusion, CIT and CMA supplementation may not increase the neuromuscular performance during low- to moderate-volume resistance training sessions in young, trained adults. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT05183893).

Research Insights

Back to top