Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Postprandial Responses to Meals Enriched With Canola or Coconut Oil in Men and Women With a Risk Phenotype for Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

  • 2025-06-19
  • Molecular nutrition & food research 69(19)
    • Hannah F Kienēs
    • Christina Diekmann
    • Tim Schiemann
    • Carolin Wiechmann
    • Christina Kopp
    • Birgit Stoffel-Wagner
    • Martin Coenen
    • Robert Németh
    • Sarah Egert

Study Design

Type
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Sample size
n = 29
Population
29 participants with increased cardiometabolic risk
Methods
randomized crossover trial, four isoenergetic meals containing 25 or 50 g of canola or coconut oil, blood samples collected fasting and 6 h postprandially
Blinding
Open-label
Duration
6 h postprandially
Funding
Unclear
  • Rigorous Journal
We investigated the metabolic response to meals with canola or coconut oil (rich in unsaturated vs. rich in saturated fatty acids [FAs]). Although the longer-term metabolic effects of these fats are well evidenced, their postprandial effects remain inconclusive. In this randomized crossover trial, 29 participants with increased cardiometabolic risk consumed four isoenergetic meals containing 25 or 50 g (low-fat meals [LFMs], high-fat meals [HFMs]) of canola or coconut oil. Blood samples for analysis of triglycerides (TGs), glucose, insulin, nonesterified FAs (NEFAs), IL-6, and individual FAs were collected in the fasting state and 6 h postprandially (every 0.5-1 h). The incremental areas under the curves (iAUCs) of TGs and IL-6 were higher after canola than after coconut oil. Concentrations of lauric and myristic acid were higher after coconut oil, while concentrations of oleic, linoleic, and α-linolenic acid were higher after canola oil. The TG iAUC was higher after HFMs than after corresponding LFMs. NEFAs decreased more after LFMs than after HFMs. The glucose and insulin iAUCs were higher after LFMs than after HFMs. Canola and coconut oil induced different metabolic responses. The manner and strength of the postprandial effects differed depending on the parameter.

Research Insights

  • The glucose and insulin iAUCs were higher after LFMs than after HFMs. (No significant difference between canola vs coconut for insulin iAUC reported)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
  • The glucose and insulin iAUCs were higher after LFMs than after HFMs. (No significant difference between canola vs coconut for glucose iAUC reported)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
  • NEFAs decreased more after LFMs than after HFMs. (NEFA iAUC comparison by fat type not explicitly reported as significant; main effect is by fat dose, not oil type)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
  • The incremental areas under the curves (iAUCs) of ... IL-6 were higher after canola than after coconut oil.

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
  • Concentrations of lauric and myristic acid were higher after coconut oil, while concentrations of oleic, linoleic, and α-linolenic acid were higher after canola oil.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
  • Concentrations of lauric and myristic acid were higher after coconut oil, while concentrations of oleic, linoleic, and α-linolenic acid were higher after canola oil.

    Effect
    Beneficial
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
  • The incremental areas under the curves (iAUCs) of TGs ... were higher after canola than after coconut oil.

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
    Dose
    25 or 50 g per meal
Back to top