Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Study Design

Type
Meta-Analysis
Sample size
n = 17
Population
normotensive, prehypertensive, and hypertensive stage 1 adults
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing olive oil and flaxseed oil supplementation on blood pressure and inflammatory markers

Background

Adding olive oil (OO) and flaxseed oil (FLO) to the diet has been reported to improve endothelial function and reduce inflammation. However, the efficacy of supplementing OO and FLO on blood pressure (BP) in normo-, pre-, and hypertensive stage 1 adults is uncertain.

Objective

This study aimed to systematically review the literature on OO and FLO supplementation on BP and select inflammatory markers in healthy adults and adults at risk of hypertension.

Methods

Four databases, PubMed, CINHAL, Web of Science, and Medline (Ovid), were searched from inception until October 2023 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing OO and FLO supplementation in normotensive or adults at risk of hypertension. The outcomes included were systolic blood pressure (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and at least one inflammatory marker, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin6 (IL6), or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). The risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs, publication bias visualization was performed using funnel plots, and meta-analysis was completed to generate average estimates of effects in 2024.

Results

Seventeen RCTs, comprising 14 studies on OO and 3 on FLO, met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on SBP n=17 mean difference (MD) -0.48; 95% CI: -1.76, 0.80; p=0.65, I2 =0%) and DBP (n=16, MD -0.47; 95% CI: -1.33, 0.39; p=0.65, I2 =0%) or inflammatory markers, CRP (n=8, MD 0.11; 95% CI: -1.18, 0.40; p=0.98, I2 =0%), IL6 (n=3, MD -0.15; 95% CI: -0.57, 0.27; p=0.87, I2 =0%), and TNFα (n=3, MD-0.08; 95% CI: -0.12, -0.03; p=0.98, I2 =0%).

Conclusion

Longer-duration, higher-dose, and larger-scale RCTs are needed to better understand the efficacy of OO and FLO supplementation on BP. Further insight will better inform dietary supplement use for preventing hypertension.

Research Insights

  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on inflammatory markers, CRP (n=8, MD 0.11; 95% CI: -1.18, 0.40; p=0.98, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on DBP (n=16, MD -0.47; 95% CI: -1.33, 0.39; p=0.65, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on inflammatory markers, IL6 (n=3, MD -0.15; 95% CI: -0.57, 0.27; p=0.87, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on SBP (n=17 mean difference (MD) -0.48; 95% CI: -1.76, 0.80; p=0.65, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on inflammatory markers, TNFα (n=3, MD-0.08; 95% CI: -0.12, -0.03; p=0.98, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on inflammatory markers, CRP (n=8, MD 0.11; 95% CI: -1.18, 0.40; p=0.98, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on DBP (n=16, MD -0.47; 95% CI: -1.33, 0.39; p=0.65, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on inflammatory markers, IL6 (n=3, MD -0.15; 95% CI: -0.57, 0.27; p=0.87, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on SBP (n=17 mean difference (MD) -0.48; 95% CI: -1.76, 0.80; p=0.65, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
  • Meta-analysis using a random-effects model reported no significant effect on inflammatory markers, TNFα (n=3, MD-0.08; 95% CI: -0.12, -0.03; p=0.98, I² =0%)

    Effect
    Neutral
    Effect size
    Small
Back to top