The effect of Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation on Helicobacter pylori eradication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials.
- 2023-12-15
- BMC infectious diseases 23(1)
- Lian-Hua Liu
- Bin Han
- Jing Tao
- Kai Zhang
- Xi-Ke Wang
- Wen-Yu Wang
- PubMed: 38102568
- DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08896-4
Study Design
- Type
- Meta-Analysis
- Sample size
- n = 2,156
- Population
- children with Helicobacter pylori infection
- Methods
- meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang database from the beginning up to September 2023; random-effects model to calculate pooled relative risk
Background
It is unclear whether Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) supplementation in standard triple therapy (STT) is effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in children. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of S. boulardii supplementation on H. pylori eradication in children.Methods
We conducted electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang database from the beginning up to September 2023. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) through a meta-analysis.Results
Fifteen RCTs (involving 2156 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that S. boulardii in combination with STT was more effective than STT alone (intention-to-treat analysis : 87.7% vs. 75.9%, RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19, P < 0.00001; per-protocol analysis : 88.5% vs. 76.3%, RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19, P < 0.00001). The S. boulardii supplementation group had a significantly lower incidence of total adverse events (n = 6 RCTs, 9.2% vs. 29.2%, RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.21-0.48, P < 0.00001), diarrhea (n = 13 RCTs, 14.7% vs. 32.4%, RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.56, P < 0.00001), and nausea (n = 11 RCTs, 12.7% vs. 21.3%, RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.72, P < 0.0001) than STT group alone. Similar results were also observed in the incidence of vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, abdominal distention, epigastric discomfort, poor appetite and stomatitis.Conclusions
Current evidence indicated that S. boulardii supplementing with STT could improve the eradication rate of H. pylori, and concurrently decrease the incidence of total adverse events and gastrointestinal adverse events in children.Research Insights
S. boulardii in combination with STT was more effective than STT alone (intention-to-treat analysis : 87.7% vs. 75.9%, RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19, P < 0.00001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of ... abdominal distention
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of ... abdominal pain
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
diarrhea (n = 13 RCTs, 14.7% vs. 32.4%, RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.56, P < 0.00001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of ... epigastric discomfort
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of ... constipation
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of ... poor appetite
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
nausea (n = 11 RCTs, 12.7% vs. 21.3%, RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.72, P < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of ... stomatitis
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
Similar results were also observed in the incidence of vomiting
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large