Skip to main content
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Evidence-Based Supplement Research

Lactobacillus amylovorus and Reduced Inflammation

Research synthesisLow evidenceMixed effect size4 studies · 4 beneficial · 0 neutral · 0 harmful

Across 4 studies, all reported beneficial effects on inflammation. The strongest evidence comes from a meta-analysis of 25 RCTs showing a small but significant reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP) (-0.99 mg/L). Three additional studies reported moderate beneficial effects but in animal models (sows, lambs) or cell cultures, and their direct relevance to Lactobacillus amylovorus is uncertain. The predominant effect size is mixed (small from the meta-analysis, moderate from the others). No consistent dose range was identified, and study durations were not consistently reported.

  • Studied populations: Adults with metabolic conditions (obesity, metabolic syndrome) based on the meta-analysis; other studies involved pregnant sows, weaned lambs, and human monocytes in vitro.

Caveats: Evidence base is small (only 4 studies) — conclusions should be considered preliminary. Available evidence is overwhelmingly positive — clinical literature in this area is subject to publication bias (null-result studies are less likely to be published or indexed). Additionally, most studies do not directly investigate Lactobacillus amylovorus but rather other postbiotics or probiotics (Bacillus subtilis, epigallocatechin), and involve non-human populations, limiting applicability to humans. The only human-level evidence aggregates multiple postbiotic types, so benefit specific to Lactobacillus amylovorus is unclear.

Generated Jun 11, 2026
4 of 4 papers
Back to top