Understanding the Differences Between Shilajit and Fulvic Minerals
Explore the distinct compositions and origins of shilajit and fulvic minerals. Learn about shilajit's role in Ayurveda and its benefits, while fulvic minerals offer enhanced nutrient absorption. Discover how these substances relate through their fulvic acid content.
What's the difference between shilajit and fulvic minerals?
Shilajit and fulvic minerals, though related, are distinct in their composition and origin.
Shilajit
- Composition: Shilajit is a complex substance primarily composed of fulvic acids, as well as dibenzo-α-pyrones, proteins, and a variety of minerals1. It is a rock exudate mostly found in the sedimentary rocks of the Himalayas and other mountain ranges2.
- Role in Ayurveda: It is considered a "maharasa," or super-vitalizer, in Ayurvedic medicine2.
- Benefits: Shilajit has been shown to improve mitochondrial function and increase the availability of ATP, which may enhance muscle strength, increase lean muscle mass, and improve exercise performance2.
Fulvic Minerals
- Composition: Fulvic minerals mainly consist of fulvic acid, which itself is a component of shilajit. Fulvic acid is a small compound that can easily pass cellular membranes and is known for enhancing nutrient absorption in cells. It typically contains a range of trace minerals in ionic form.
- Source: Fulvic minerals are derived from soil and decomposed plant matter, unlike shilajit which is a specific exudate.
In summary, while both shilajit and fulvic minerals contain fulvic acid, shilajit is a more complex mixture with a variety of other components and has a particular cultural and medicinal significance in Ayurveda. Fulvic minerals focus on the trace mineral content and the nutritional transport capacity of fulvic acid.
Footnotes
-
Joshua L. Keller, "The effects of Shilajit supplementation on fatigue-induced decreases in muscular strength and serum hydroxyproline levels," PubMed Central, 2019. ↩