Beta-Alanine Supplementation and Sport Climbing Performance.
- 2021-05-18
- International journal of environmental research and public health 18(10)
- Krzysztof Sas-Nowosielski
- Judyta Wyciślik
- Piotr Kaczka
- PubMed: 34069981
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105370
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Population
- Fifteen elite climbers
- Methods
- Double-blind, pre/post experimental design, 4 weeks of 4.0 g·d^-1 BA or placebo, intermittent high-force high-velocity campus board exercise and two bouldering traverses
- Blinding
- Double-blind
- Duration
- four weeks
- Funding
- Unclear
Background
Supplementing β-alanine (BA) improves exercise performance in efforts that are highly dependent on anaerobic glycolysis. As it has not yet been established whether it relates to climbing, the current study aimed to investigate the effects of BA on climbing-specific performance.Methods
Fifteen elite climbers performed intermittent high-force high-velocity campus board exercise, and two bouldering traverses, hard and easy. They ingested 4.0 g·d-1 BA or placebo for four weeks in a double-blind, pre/post experimental design.Results
In the campus board trial, ANOVA revealed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.066). Post hoc analysis revealed that there was a significant (p = 0.002) and "large" (d = 1.55) increase in the total number of "slaps" in the BA group. No significant supplementation × group interaction was found in "hard" traverse and a significant interaction for mean changes in number of moves (p = 0.025) and in time to failure (p = 0.044) on an "easy" traverse. Post hoc analysis revealed that only the BA group significantly improved from baseline in number of moves (+9.5) and time to failure (+32 s). Effect sizes were d = 1.73 and d = 1.44, respectively.Conclusions
Four weeks of BA supplementation can improve performance during continuous climbing lasting about 1 min and repeated bouts of upper body campus-like movements. However, it failed to enhance climbing of a shorter duration.Research Insights
No significant supplementation × group interaction was found in 'hard' traverse
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 4.0 g·d⁻¹
ANOVA revealed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.066)
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 4.0 g·d⁻¹
a significant interaction for mean changes in number of moves (p = 0.025) ... Post hoc analysis revealed that only the BA group significantly improved from baseline in number of moves (+9.5) ... Effect sizes were d = 1.73
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- 4.0 g/day
In the campus board trial, ANOVA revealed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.066).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 4.0 g/day
No significant supplementation × group interaction was found in 'hard' traverse
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- 4.0 g/day
and in time to failure (p = 0.044) on an 'easy' traverse. Post hoc analysis revealed that only the BA group significantly improved ... time to failure (+32 s). Effect sizes were ... d = 1.44
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- 4.0 g/day