Clinical effectiveness and safety of total glucosides of paeony as an immunomodulator in patients with refractory oral lichen planus: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.
- 2026-02
- Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology 151
- Yiwen Deng
- Leilei Zhou
- Na Li
- Fan Huang
- Guanhuan Du
- Yufeng Wang
- Jian Meng
- Shijie Chen
- Xiufeng Wei
- Wenmei Wang
- Guoyao Tang
- PubMed: 41539096
- DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2026.157770
Study Design
- Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Sample size
- n = 448
- Population
- 448 adults with symptomatic refractory OLP from five Chinese centers
- Methods
- Multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, active-controlled trial; participants randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive basic therapy (tapering prednisone from 15 mg to 5 mg over 4 weeks plus standardized oral hygiene) or basic therapy plus TGP (0.6 g three times daily for 12 months)
- Blinding
- Open-label
- Duration
- 12 months
- Funding
- Unclear
- Large Human Trial
Background
Refractory oral lichen planus (OLP) poses a treatment challenge due to its chronic nature, symptoms, and potential for malignant transformation. Total glucosides of paeony (TGP), a botanical immunomodulator that targets NF-κB and Th17 pathways, have demonstrated promise in managing OLP. However, robust clinical evidence from real-world settings remains lacking.Purpose
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of TGP as an add-on therapy for patients with symptomatic refractory OLP in a real-world clinical trial setting.Study design
This multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, active-controlled trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-IPR-16,010,156) enrolled 448 adults with symptomatic refractory OLP from five Chinese centers between January 2017 and December 2020. The pragmatic design assessed TGP under real-world conditions.Methods
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive basic therapy (tapering prednisone from 15 mg to 5 mg over 4 weeks plus standardized oral hygiene; n = 222) or basic therapy plus TGP (0.6 g three times daily for 12 months; n = 226). The primary endpoint was the time from randomization to complete response (CR), defined as reducing the VAS pain score and Thongprasom sign score to 0 or 1 (or to 0 if the baseline score was 1).Results
The TGP group demonstrated significantly faster achievement of CR and higher CR rates compared to controls (53.9% vs. 34.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-2.82; p < 0.0001) and better overall response rates at 12 months (70.6% vs. 44.4%; odds ratio [OR] 2.99; 95% CI 2.01-4.44; p < 0.0001). Patients receiving TGP also experienced greater improvements in sleep quality (PSQI responder rate: HR 1.49, p = 0.038). The safety analysis primarily showed mild adverse events, with a higher incidence of diarrhea in the TGP group (5.5% vs. 0.9%), but no severe events or treatment discontinuations.Conclusion
As an add-on therapy, TGP significantly improved clinical outcomes in refractory OLP in a real-world setting, demonstrating immunomodulatory effects and a favorable safety profile. These pragmatic trial results support TGP as a promising and effective long-term add-on therapy for the long-term management of this potentially malignant disorder.Research Insights
TGP group demonstrated significantly faster achievement of CR and higher CR rates compared to controls (53.9% vs. 34.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-2.82; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- 0.6 g three times daily
better overall response rates at 12 months (70.6% vs. 44.4%; odds ratio [OR] 2.99; 95% CI 2.01-4.44; p < 0.0001)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Large
- Dose
- 0.6 g three times daily
Patients receiving TGP also experienced greater improvements in sleep quality (PSQI responder rate: HR 1.49, p = 0.038)
- Effect
- Beneficial
- Effect size
- Moderate
- Dose
- 0.6 g three times daily
Adverse Events Reported
The safety analysis primarily showed mild adverse events, with a higher incidence of diarrhea in the TGP group (5.5% vs. 0.9%)
- Finding
- Increased risk
- Grade
- mild
- Magnitude
- 5.5% vs. 0.9%
- Significant
- Yes
The safety analysis primarily showed mild adverse events, with a higher incidence of diarrhea in the TGP group (5.5% vs. 0.9%), but no severe events or treatment discontinuations.
- Finding
- Reported
- Grade
- mild
but no severe events or treatment discontinuations.
- Finding
- Reported
- Severity
- Serious adverse event