Effect of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- 2025-03-27
- BMC pediatrics 25(1)
- PubMed: 40140789
- DOI: 10.1186/s12887-025-05469-z
Study Design
- Type
- Systematic Review
- Sample size
- n = 661
- Population
- preterm infants
- Methods
- network meta-analysis of 51 randomized controlled trials involving 11,661 participants
Background
Previous studies have suggested that probiotics may have potential benefits for preterm infants. Their efficacy seems to depend on the particular species or combinations used.Methods
To further investigate the effects of probiotics in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other related outcomes in preterm infants, we conducted a network meta-analysis of 51 randomized controlled trials involving 11,661 participants.Results
Our study revealed that most probiotics can effectively reduce the incidence of NEC (at or beyond Bell's stage II). Lactobacillus (RR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.98), the combination of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (RR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.87), and the combination of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus (RR, 0.17; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.84) were the only treatments that significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to placebo. Lactobacillus can be effective in reducing the time preterm infants spend in the hospital (MD, -4.23; 95% CI: -7.62, -0.81) and reaching full enteral feeding (MD, -2.15; 95% CI: -3.70, -0.64).Conclusions
The combination of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus was the most efficacious in reducing the mortality and incidence of NEC (Bell II or above) in preterm infants. Both prebiotics and Lactobacillus alone were found to be highly effective in reducing the length of hospitalization and the time needed to achieve full enteral feeding. No evidence suggests that probiotics affect sepsis risk.Trial registration
The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023460231) on March 10, 2023.Research Insights
| Supplement | Dose | Health Outcome | Effect Type | Effect Size | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bifidobacterium bifidum HA-132 | — | Reduced All-Cause Mortality | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceLactobacillus (RR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.98), the combination of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (RR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.87), and the combination of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus (RR, 0.17; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.84) were the only treatments that significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to placebo. |
| Bifidobacterium bifidum HA-132 | — | Reduced Incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceMost probiotics can effectively reduce the incidence of NEC (at or beyond Bell's stage II). |
| Bifidobacterium bifidum HA-132 | — | Reduced Length of Hospital Stay | Beneficial | Small | View sourceLactobacillus can be effective in reducing the time preterm infants spend in the hospital (MD, -4.23; 95% CI: -7.62, -0.81). |
| Bifidobacterium bifidum HA-132 | — | Reduced Time to Full Enteral Feeding | Beneficial | Small | View sourceLactobacillus can be effective in reducing the time preterm infants spend in the hospital (MD, -4.23; 95% CI: -7.62, -0.81) and reaching full enteral feeding (MD, -2.15; 95% CI: -3.70, -0.64). |
| Bifidobacterium infantis HA-116 | — | No Change in Sepsis Risk | Neutral | Small | View sourceNo evidence suggests that probiotics affect sepsis risk. |
| Bifidobacterium infantis HA-116 | — | Reduced All-Cause Mortality | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceLactobacillus (RR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.98), the combination of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (RR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.87), and the combination of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus (RR, 0.17; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.84) were the only treatments that significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to placebo. |
| Bifidobacterium infantis HA-116 | — | Reduced Incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis | Beneficial | Moderate | View sourceMost probiotics can effectively reduce the incidence of NEC (at or beyond Bell's stage II). |
| Bifidobacterium infantis HA-116 | — | Reduced Length of Hospital Stay | Beneficial | Small | View sourceLactobacillus can be effective in reducing the time preterm infants spend in the hospital (MD, -4.23; 95% CI: -7.62, -0.81). |
| Bifidobacterium infantis HA-116 | — | Reduced Time to Full Enteral Feeding | Beneficial | Small | View sourceLactobacillus can be effective in reducing the time preterm infants spend in the hospital (MD, -4.23; 95% CI: -7.62, -0.81) and reaching full enteral feeding (MD, -2.15; 95% CI: -3.70, -0.64). |