Effects of intermittent overload doses of oral vitamin D3 on serum 25(OH)D concentrations and the incidence rates of fractures, falls, and mortality in elderly individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- 2024-09-06
- Biomolecules & biomedicine 24(5)
- Xiaoyang Tao
- Wupeng Yang
- Qinxin Zhang
- Yongjiang Wang
- Feng Gao
- Yuehan Wang
- Tingxin Zhang
- Hao Liu
- Jindong Chen
- PubMed: 38615341
- DOI: 10.17305/bb.2024.10449
Study Design
- Type
- Meta-Analysis
- Population
- elderly individuals
- Methods
- Meta-analysis of 14 RCTs on high-dose intermittent oral vitamin D3 (over 800 IU per day) monthly administration
Research Insights
This regimen showed no increase in all-cause mortality, with a risk ratio (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.87-1.04).
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- intermittent monthly administration of vitamin D3 (over 800 IU per day)
Likewise, it did not significantly reduce the risks of falls and fractures, with risk ratios of 1.02 (0.98-1.05) and 0.95 (0.87-1.04) respectively.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- intermittent monthly administration of vitamin D3 (over 800 IU per day)
Likewise, it did not significantly reduce the risks of falls and fractures, with risk ratios of 1.02 (0.98-1.05) and 0.95 (0.87-1.04) respectively.
- Effect
- Neutral
- Effect size
- Small
- Dose
- intermittent monthly administration of vitamin D3 (over 800 IU per day)
Adverse Events Reported
This regimen showed no increase in all-cause mortality, with a risk ratio (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.87-1.04).
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Severity
- Serious adverse event
- Magnitude
- risk ratio (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.87-1.04)
- Significant
- No
it did not significantly reduce the risks of falls and fractures, with risk ratios of 1.02 (0.98-1.05) and 0.95 (0.87-1.04) respectively.
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Magnitude
- risk ratios of 1.02 (0.98-1.05)
- Significant
- No
it did not significantly reduce the risks of falls and fractures, with risk ratios of 1.02 (0.98-1.05) and 0.95 (0.87-1.04) respectively.
- Finding
- No significant difference
- Severity
- Serious adverse event
- Magnitude
- risk ratios ... 0.95 (0.87-1.04)
- Significant
- No
further research is needed to determine if this method would increase the incidence of falls. Therefore, it is not recommended at this stage due to the lack of demonstrated safety in additional relevant RCTs.
- Finding
- Reported